<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating Complexity: Lock-In To Bad Technologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codesimplicity.com/archives/31/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/archives/31</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max Kanat-Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/archives/31#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kanat-Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=31#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I definitely agree. That’s one of those good technology choices that allows you to have interoperability without much sacrifice. Of course, you have to choose an ORM that also fits all of the criteria, but Hibernate is well-enough used that even though I’ve never used it, I would probably look at it as my first choice if I were developing in Java, just because it has that much momentum.

Recently I used SQLAlchemy in Python, and that is really a great ORM.

-Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I definitely agree. That’s one of those good technology choices that allows you to have interoperability without much sacrifice. Of course, you have to choose an ORM that also fits all of the criteria, but Hibernate is well-enough used that even though I’ve never used it, I would probably look at it as my first choice if I were developing in Java, just because it has that much momentum.</p>
<p>Recently I used SQLAlchemy in Python, and that is really a great ORM.</p>
<p>-Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peng&#8217;s links for Thursday, 17 July &#171; I&#8217;m Just an Avatar</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/archives/31#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Peng&#8217;s links for Thursday, 17 July &#171; I&#8217;m Just an Avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=31#comment-355</guid>
		<description>[...] Kanat-Alexander: Creating Complexity: Lock-In To Bad Technologies. Max expands a point in his post The Never-Shipping Product to look at what &#8220;bad&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kanat-Alexander: Creating Complexity: Lock-In To Bad Technologies. Max expands a point in his post The Never-Shipping Product to look at what &#8220;bad&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funtomas</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/archives/31#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>funtomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=31#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Regarding the SQL lock-in, there's a third way to escape: use of Object-Relational Mapping tier, such as Hibernate in case of Java, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the SQL lock-in, there&#8217;s a third way to escape: use of Object-Relational Mapping tier, such as Hibernate in case of Java, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
