<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unforseeable Consequences: Why We Have Principles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/unforseeable-consequences-why-we-have-principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/unforseeable-consequences-why-we-have-principles/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 03:40:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max Kanat-Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/unforseeable-consequences-why-we-have-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kanat-Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=32#comment-2013</guid>
		<description>Well, my hope is that the principles that I&#039;m evolving here actually cover both that 99% and that 1% situation. That is, the idea is that the &lt;em&gt;general&lt;/em&gt; principles can&#039;t be too specific, or there&#039;s going to be some situation in which they fail. The important thing is to have good general principles that apply to &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; situations (by virtue of being natural laws, ideally) and then use your judgment on how to apply them in the practical situations you find yourself in.

-Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my hope is that the principles that I&#8217;m evolving here actually cover both that 99% and that 1% situation. That is, the idea is that the <em>general</em> principles can&#8217;t be too specific, or there&#8217;s going to be some situation in which they fail. The important thing is to have good general principles that apply to <em>all</em> situations (by virtue of being natural laws, ideally) and then use your judgment on how to apply them in the practical situations you find yourself in.</p>
<p>-Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ape</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/unforseeable-consequences-why-we-have-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Ape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=32#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>The problem is when your principles work for 99% of the situations, but backfire for the other 1%.

The good news is that you are likely working in the 99%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is when your principles work for 99% of the situations, but backfire for the other 1%.</p>
<p>The good news is that you are likely working in the 99%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Patterns</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/unforseeable-consequences-why-we-have-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Patterns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=32#comment-601</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 2 members originally found by leesz on 2008-08-21  Code Simplicity: Unforseeable Consequences: Why We Have Principles  http://www.codesimplicity.com/archives/32 - bookmarked by 4 members originally found by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; bookmarked by 2 members originally found by leesz on 2008-08-21  Code Simplicity: Unforseeable Consequences: Why We Have Principles  <a href="http://www.codesimplicity.com/archives/32" rel="nofollow">http://www.codesimplicity.com/archives/32</a> &#8211; bookmarked by 4 members originally found by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kanat-Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/unforseeable-consequences-why-we-have-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kanat-Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=32#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Wow, yeah, that&#039;s a really interesting thing to think about!

-Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, yeah, that&#8217;s a really interesting thing to think about!</p>
<p>-Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Howe</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/unforseeable-consequences-why-we-have-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Howe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=32#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Methinks that all of this would apply equally well to finance. A little off-topic perhaps but I think it is high time for finance to become more of an engineering discipline (complete with silly things like fail safes, redundancies, personal liability, ...) than the current gambling free-for-all that we have now. Engineers learned their lessons through years of death and destruction; programmers are starting to learn their lessons through years of destruction (and maybe a little death); finance has been around longer than both and has caused more death and destruction than both combined but it is still based on little more than hope and delusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks that all of this would apply equally well to finance. A little off-topic perhaps but I think it is high time for finance to become more of an engineering discipline (complete with silly things like fail safes, redundancies, personal liability, &#8230;) than the current gambling free-for-all that we have now. Engineers learned their lessons through years of death and destruction; programmers are starting to learn their lessons through years of destruction (and maybe a little death); finance has been around longer than both and has caused more death and destruction than both combined but it is still based on little more than hope and delusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

