<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is A Bug?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/what-is-a-bug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/what-is-a-bug/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:07:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max Kanat-Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/what-is-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kanat-Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=36#comment-384</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree. I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;/archives/24&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an article on pretty much exactly that&lt;/a&gt; (though your specific point about it happening as &quot;assumptions about usability&quot; is a good one, people definitely do that!).

-Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree. I wrote <a href="/archives/24" rel="nofollow">an article on pretty much exactly that</a> (though your specific point about it happening as &#8220;assumptions about usability&#8221; is a good one, people definitely do that!).</p>
<p>-Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kanat-Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/what-is-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kanat-Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=36#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Well, I think that could be classified under the &quot;specifiers intentions,&quot; which is basically like the programmer&#039;s intentions but on a wider-scale project where the implementer isn&#039;t the &quot;intender.&quot;

However, it&#039;s important to not be so dogmatic to a spec that you violate common and reasonable user expectations. It&#039;s exactly the same point I made above in the blog, but expanded slightly to also apply to any intention, whether it&#039;s the implementer&#039;s or the spec writer&#039;s.

-Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think that could be classified under the &#8220;specifiers intentions,&#8221; which is basically like the programmer&#8217;s intentions but on a wider-scale project where the implementer isn&#8217;t the &#8220;intender.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s important to not be so dogmatic to a spec that you violate common and reasonable user expectations. It&#8217;s exactly the same point I made above in the blog, but expanded slightly to also apply to any intention, whether it&#8217;s the implementer&#8217;s or the spec writer&#8217;s.</p>
<p>-Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin Reddy Katkam</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/what-is-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin Reddy Katkam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=36#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Another definition for a bug is: &quot;Anything that isn&#039;t according to specification&quot;

If the design document says you click on the button and there ought to be a modal popup but in the implementation the popup isn&#039;t modal, you&#039;ve got a bug! The programmer probably skipped over the line that said in bold with italics and underlined: &quot;This popup should be modal&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another definition for a bug is: &#8220;Anything that isn&#8217;t according to specification&#8221;</p>
<p>If the design document says you click on the button and there ought to be a modal popup but in the implementation the popup isn&#8217;t modal, you&#8217;ve got a bug! The programmer probably skipped over the line that said in bold with italics and underlined: &#8220;This popup should be modal&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kasper graversen</title>
		<link>http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/what-is-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>kasper graversen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesimplicity.com/?p=36#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Or sometimes because you want the app to be as good or userfriendly as possible, you risk assuming things are bugs in usability, when in fact they aren&#039;t. The problem is your assumptions made without involving the customer. If you&#039;re interested in this point of view of what a bug is see  http://firstclassthoughts.co.uk/misc/creativity_killed_the_app.html

cheers, 
 kasper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or sometimes because you want the app to be as good or userfriendly as possible, you risk assuming things are bugs in usability, when in fact they aren&#8217;t. The problem is your assumptions made without involving the customer. If you&#8217;re interested in this point of view of what a bug is see  <a href="http://firstclassthoughts.co.uk/misc/creativity_killed_the_app.html" rel="nofollow">http://firstclassthoughts.co.uk/misc/creativity_killed_the_app.html</a></p>
<p>cheers,<br />
 kasper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
